12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Continental UltraContact vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

Testprofiel

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Continental
UltraContact
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Aantal tests
10
14
1
18
Beste positie
#2
#1
#7
#1
Gemiddelde positie
6.0
3.6
7.0
6.1
Laatste test
2026
2025
2023
2024
Beschikbare maten
109
194
88
47

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Continental UltraContact
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Continental UltraContact
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Continental UltraContact
58%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Soelaas
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Buitengeluid
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Soelaas
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Droog
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Continental UltraContact
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Droogremmen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Continental UltraContact
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Droge behandeling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Prestaties op droog wegdek
Kumho Ecsta HS52
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Kosten
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Continental UltraContact
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Rolweerstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kilometrage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Continental UltraContact
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Prijs/waarde
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%

Tread pattern comparison

Kumho Ecsta HS52
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store