12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofiel

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Continental
PremiumContact 7
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Aantal tests
10
14
28
4
Beste positie
#2
#1
#1
#2
Gemiddelde positie
6.0
3.6
2.3
3.3
Laatste test
2026
2025
2026
2026
Beschikbare maten
109
194
67
40

Nat

Nat
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Prestaties op nat wegdek
Kumho Ecsta HS52
95%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Buitengeluid
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Soelaas
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Inwendig geluid
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Droog

Droog
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Droogremmen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Droge behandeling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Prestaties op droog wegdek
Kumho Ecsta HS52
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%

Kosten

Kosten
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rolweerstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kilometrage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Prijs/waarde
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking