12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Imperial EcoSport 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Testprofiel

Imperial
EcoSport 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Aantal tests
5
4
15
5
Beste positie
#38
#2
#2
#1
Gemiddelde positie
43.8
3.3
9.0
2.8
Laatste test
2026
2026
2025
2026
Beschikbare maten
88
40
226
139

Nat

Nat
Imperial EcoSport 2
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Imperial EcoSport 2
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Imperial EcoSport 2
59%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Imperial EcoSport 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Imperial EcoSport 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%

Droog

Droog
Imperial EcoSport 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Droogremmen
Imperial EcoSport 2
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Droge behandeling
Imperial EcoSport 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Imperial EcoSport 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Buitengeluid
Imperial EcoSport 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking