Vergelijking: Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Dunlop Winter vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Premie

Hankook

ION Evo

VS

Vergelijk ook met

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

PremiumContact 7

Testprofiel

ION Evo

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Winter

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Blizzak 6

Aantal tests

1

3

2

5

14

Beste positie

#1

#2

#1

Gemiddelde positie

1.0

3.3

1.5

2.2

3.6

Laatste test

2025

2026

2025

Beschikbare maten

64

40

65

63

188

Nat

Hankook ION Evo

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

78%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Hankook ION Evo

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Hankook ION Evo

97%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Dunlop Winter

84%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Hankook ION Evo

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Dunlop Winter

71%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Dunlop Winter

63%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Dunlop Winter

67%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Kosten

Hankook ION Evo

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Dunlop Winter

83%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Rolweerstand

Hankook ION Evo

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Dunlop Winter

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

85%

Kilometrage

Hankook ION Evo

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

28%

Prijs/waarde

Hankook ION Evo

60%

Dunlop Winter

84%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

87%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

Droog

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Dunlop Winter

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

72%

Droge behandeling

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Dunlop Winter

64%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

Droogremmen

Hankook ION Evo

91%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

56%

Soelaas

Hankook ION Evo

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Soelaas

Hankook ION Evo

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Buitengeluid

Hankook ION Evo

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

66%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Vergelijking: Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Dunlop Winter vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

ION Evo

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Winter

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Blizzak 6

Testprofiel

Nat

Kosten

Droog

Soelaas

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking