12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Falken e.Ziex

Testprofiel

Hankook
ION Evo
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Falken
e.Ziex
Falken
e.Ziex
Aantal tests
1
18
4
15
3
3
Beste positie
#1
#1
#2
#2
#2
#2
Gemiddelde positie
1.0
6.1
3.3
9.0
3.7
3.7
Laatste test
2025
2024
2026
2025
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
66
47
40
226
36
36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nat
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Kosten
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Prijs/waarde
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
63%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Rolweerstand
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Kilometrage
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Soelaas
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Soelaas
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Buitengeluid
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Droog
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Droogremmen
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Droge behandeling
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Tread pattern comparison

Hankook ION Evo
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store