12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofiel

Hankook
ION Evo
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Aantal tests
1
18
4
15
28
Beste positie
#1
#1
#2
#2
#1
Gemiddelde positie
1.0
6.1
3.3
9.0
2.3
Laatste test
2025
2024
2026
2025
2026
Beschikbare maten
66
47
40
226
67

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Kosten
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Prijs/waarde
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
63%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Rolweerstand
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Kilometrage
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Droog
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Droge behandeling
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Droogremmen
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Soelaas
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Soelaas
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Buitengeluid
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%

Tread pattern comparison

Hankook ION Evo
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store