12 Shops · 123,162+ Products

Vergelijking: Hankook ION Evo vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Yokohama BluEarth-XT

Test profile

Hankook
ION Evo
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Falken
e.Ziex
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Yokohama
BluEarth-XT
Aantal tests
1
26
5
3
6
1
Best position
#1
#1
#1
#2
#3
#7
Average position
1.0
2.2
2.2
3.7
4.7
7.0
Laatste test
2025
2026
2025
2025
2026
2025
Beschikbare maten
64
66
63
34
146

Nat

Nat
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
59%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
51%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
62%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
38%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
77%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
75%

Kosten

Kosten
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
51%
Rolweerstand
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
51%
Kilometrage
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
45%
Prijs/waarde
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
60%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
82%
Soelaas
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
69%
Buitengeluid
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
95%

Droog

Droog
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
66%
Droogremmen
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
64%
Droge behandeling
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
67%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Gezamenlijke testen beschikbaar
Deze banden zijn samen getest in 1 test(s). Klik om gedetailleerde onderlinge resultaten te bekijken.

Wederzijdse tests

OrganisatieSeizoenJaarMaat
AutobildAutobild
De zomer
2025215/55 R18Bekijk

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking