Vergelijking: Hankook ION Evo vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Premie

Hankook

ION Evo

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Pilot Sport 5

Cinturato (C3)

Test profile

ION Evo

PremiumContact 7

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

e.Ziex

Roadhawk 2

UltraContact NXT

Aantal tests

1

26

5

3

6

2

Best position

#1

#2

#3

#1

Average position

1.0

2.2

3.7

4.7

1.0

Laatste test

2025

2026

2025

2026

2025

Beschikbare maten

64

66

63

34

146

23

Nat

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

86%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Continental PremiumContact 7

94%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

95%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental PremiumContact 7

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

84%

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Kosten

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

68%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Kilometrage

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Continental PremiumContact 7

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

38%

Prijs/waarde

Hankook ION Evo

60%

Continental PremiumContact 7

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

87%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

60%

Rolweerstand

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

85%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Soelaas

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

Soelaas

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

71%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Buitengeluid

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Continental PremiumContact 7

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

66%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

Droog

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

79%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Droogremmen

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

81%

Continental UltraContact NXT

63%

Droge behandeling

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental PremiumContact 7

85%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Vergelijking: Hankook ION Evo vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

ION Evo

PremiumContact 7

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

e.Ziex

Roadhawk 2

UltraContact NXT

Test profile

Nat

Kosten

Soelaas

Droog

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking