Vergelijking: Hankook ION Evo vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Yokohama BluEarth-XT vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Premie

Hankook

ION Evo

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Pilot Sport 5

UltraContact NXT

Test profile

ION Evo

PremiumContact 7

e.Ziex

BluEarth-XT

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Aantal tests

1

26

3

1

3

Best position

#1

#2

#7

#2

Average position

1.0

2.2

3.7

7.0

3.3

Laatste test

2025

2026

2025

2026

Beschikbare maten

64

66

34

—

40

Nat

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

59%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

51%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Continental PremiumContact 7

94%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

38%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental PremiumContact 7

92%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Kosten

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

51%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Prijs/waarde

Hankook ION Evo

60%

Continental PremiumContact 7

77%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

60%

Rolweerstand

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

51%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Kilometrage

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Continental PremiumContact 7

81%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

45%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Soelaas

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Soelaas

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Buitengeluid

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Continental PremiumContact 7

69%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

95%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Droog

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Droogremmen

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

64%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Droge behandeling

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental PremiumContact 7

85%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Vergelijking: Hankook ION Evo vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Yokohama BluEarth-XT vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

PremiumContact 7

e.Ziex

BluEarth-XT

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test profile

Nat

Kosten

Soelaas

Droog

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking