Vergelijking: GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

GT

Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

VS

WinterCraft WP52

Blizzak LM-005

8.2

R14 – R22

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance 3

Test profile

Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

WinterCraft WP52

Blizzak LM-005

Aantal tests

3

10

49

Best position

#3

#2

#1

Average position

9.7

12.2

3.2

Laatste test

2024

Beschikbare maten

32

207

213

Nat

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

57%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

70%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

56%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

56%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

84%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

54%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

64%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

86%

Remmen op nat wegdek

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

70%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

95%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

59%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

61%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

48%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

93%

Sneeuw

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

71%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

78%

Remmen op sneeuw

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

72%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

73%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

86%

Sneeuwverwerking

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

69%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

74%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

72%

Tractie op sneeuw

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

72%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

Sneeuw in bochten

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

73%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

70%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

77%

Kosten

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

62%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

70%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

78%

Kilometrage

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

45%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

64%

Rolweerstand

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

65%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

65%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

87%

Prijs/waarde

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

84%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

60%

Soelaas

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

62%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

62%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

Soelaas

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

57%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

64%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

83%

Buitengeluid

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

67%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

60%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

79%

Droog

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

53%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

73%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

Droogremmen

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

63%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

Droge behandeling

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

44%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

62%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

89%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Vergelijking: GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

WinterCraft WP52

Blizzak LM-005

Test profile

Nat

Sneeuw

Kosten

Soelaas

Droog

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking