Vergelijking: Gt Radial Fe2 vs. Petlas Imperium PT515 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Gt

Radial Fe2

R14 – R18

VS

Budget

Petlas

Vergelijk ook met

UltraContact NXT

Cinturato (C3)

PremiumContact 7

Testprofiel

Radial Fe2

Imperium PT515

ION Evo

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Aantal tests

—

5

1

4

Beste positie

—

#13

#1

#2

Gemiddelde positie

—

24.0

1.0

3.3

Laatste test

—

2024

2025

2026

Beschikbare maten

—

11

66

40

Nat

Gt Radial Fe2

75%

Petlas Imperium PT515

54%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Gt Radial Fe2

74%

Petlas Imperium PT515

66%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Gt Radial Fe2

69%

Petlas Imperium PT515

55%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

84%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Gt Radial Fe2

75%

Petlas Imperium PT515

71%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Gt Radial Fe2

79%

Petlas Imperium PT515

60%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Gt Radial Fe2

80%

Petlas Imperium PT515

30%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Soelaas

Gt Radial Fe2

82%

Petlas Imperium PT515

75%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Soelaas

Gt Radial Fe2

79%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Buitengeluid

Gt Radial Fe2

74%

Petlas Imperium PT515

70%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Droog

Gt Radial Fe2

75%

Petlas Imperium PT515

46%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

Droogremmen

Gt Radial Fe2

80%

Petlas Imperium PT515

63%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Droge behandeling

Gt Radial Fe2

71%

Petlas Imperium PT515

30%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Kosten

Gt Radial Fe2

67%

Petlas Imperium PT515

72%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Kilometrage

Gt Radial Fe2

72%

Petlas Imperium PT515

75%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Rolweerstand

Gt Radial Fe2

65%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Ranglijsten verkennen

Banden voor ev-auto's Beste droge behandeling banden Beste regenbanden Beste handling banden Stilste banden Meest zuinige banden Beste anti-aquaplaning banden

Populaire bandenvergelijkingen

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

Vergelijk ook

Petlas Imperium PT515 vs Barum Bravuris 5 HM

Petlas Imperium PT515 vs Semperit Speed-Life 3

Petlas Imperium PT515 vs Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

Petlas Imperium PT515 vs Sava Intensa HP2

Hankook ION Evo vs Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

Hankook ION Evo vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

Hankook ION Evo vs Bridgestone Turanza T005

Hankook ION Evo vs Bridgestone Potenza Sport

Bladeren op merk

Vergelijking: Gt Radial Fe2 vs. Petlas Imperium PT515 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Radial Fe2

Imperium PT515

ION Evo

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofiel

Nat

Soelaas

Droog

Kosten

Afmetingen en prijzen

Ranglijsten verkennen

Populaire bandenvergelijkingen

Vergelijk ook

Bladeren op merk

Voeg toe aan vergelijking