12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Gt Radial Fe2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Testprofiel

Gt
Radial Fe2
Hankook
ION Evo
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Aantal tests
1
18
4
3
3
Beste positie
#1
#1
#2
#2
#1
Gemiddelde positie
1.0
6.1
3.3
3.7
1.3
Laatste test
2025
2024
2026
2025
2026
Beschikbare maten
66
47
40
36
23

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Confidence
Gt Radial Fe2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Gt Radial Fe2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Gt Radial Fe2
69%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Gt Radial Fe2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Gt Radial Fe2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Gt Radial Fe2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Soelaas
Confidence
Gt Radial Fe2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Buitengeluid
Gt Radial Fe2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Soelaas
Gt Radial Fe2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
90%
Droog
Confidence
Gt Radial Fe2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
Droogremmen
Gt Radial Fe2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Droge behandeling
Gt Radial Fe2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
98%
Kosten
Confidence
Gt Radial Fe2
67%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
Rolweerstand
Gt Radial Fe2
65%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental UltraContact NXT
83%
Kilometrage
Gt Radial Fe2
72%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store