Vergelijking: GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320

Premie

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance+

VS

Blizzak LM-005

Winter i*cept evo2 W320

R15 – R22

1 gemeenschappelijke test(s) met gedetailleerde gegevens

Vergelijk ook met

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance 3

Testprofiel

UltraGrip Performance+

Blizzak LM-005

Winter i*cept evo2 W320

Aantal tests

23

49

9

Beste positie

#1

#5

Gemiddelde positie

3.3

3.2

7.4

Laatste test

2025

2024

2019

Beschikbare maten

176

213

124

Prestatievergelijking

Natte prestaties

84%

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

60%

Hankook

Winter i*cept evo2 W320

Remmen op nat wegdek

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

100%

Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320

70%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

100%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

100%

Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320

60%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

70%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

70%

Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320

60%

Aquaplaning longitudinaal

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

70%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

70%

Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320

60%

Aquaplaning transversaal

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

100%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

70%

Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320

50%

Droge prestaties

80%

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance+

85%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

80%

Hankook

Winter i*cept evo2 W320

Droogremmen

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

100%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320

70%

Droge behandeling

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320

80%

Droge rijstrookwissel

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

70%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

80%

Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320

80%

Droge stuurreactie

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

70%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

80%

Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320

90%

Sneeuwprestaties

98%

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance+

90%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

88%

Hankook

Winter i*cept evo2 W320

Remmen op sneeuw

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

90%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

100%

Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320

80%

Tractie op sneeuw

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

100%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

80%

Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320

100%

Sneeuwverwerking

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

100%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320

90%

Bochten op sneeuw in cirkel

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

100%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320

80%

Comfort & geluid

90%

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance+

90%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

95%

Hankook

Winter i*cept evo2 W320

Exterieurgeluid

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

90%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320

100%

Rijcomfort

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

90%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320

90%

Economie

80%

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance+

90%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

50%

Hankook

Winter i*cept evo2 W320

Rolweerstand

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320

50%

Tests gebruikt in vergelijking

Organisatie	Seizoen	Jaar	Maat
Automotorsport	Winter	2019	215/55 R17	Bekijk

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Bekijk algemene vergelijking

Vergelijking: GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320

UltraGrip Performance+

Blizzak LM-005

Winter i*cept evo2 W320

Testprofiel

Prestatievergelijking

Tests gebruikt in vergelijking

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking