12 Winkels · 123,162+ Producten

Vergelijking: GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Testprofiel

GoodYear
Efficientgrip SUV
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Aantal tests
3
14
Beste positie
#4
#1
Gemiddelde positie
4.3
3.6
Laatste test
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
123
97
188

Nat

Nat
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
89%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
71%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
87%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Remmen op nat wegdek
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
89%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
86%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%

Droog

Droog
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
92%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Droge behandeling
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
93%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Droogremmen
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
92%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
56%

Kosten

Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Rolweerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
88%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Kilometrage
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
70%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
28%

Soelaas

Soelaas
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Buitengeluid
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
70%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking