Vergelijking: GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Premie

GoodYear

Efficientgrip SUV

R16 – R22

VS

Premie

GoodYear

Vergelijk ook met

PILOT ALPIN 5

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

Testprofiel

Efficientgrip SUV

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

PremiumContact 7

Aantal tests

—

3

5

26

Beste positie

—

#2

#1

Gemiddelde positie

—

3.3

3.7

2.2

Laatste test

—

2026

2025

2026

Beschikbare maten

123

40

34

63

66

Nat

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Remmen op nat wegdek

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Continental PremiumContact 7

94%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Continental PremiumContact 7

92%

Droog

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Droge behandeling

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

93%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Continental PremiumContact 7

85%

Droogremmen

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Kosten

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Rolweerstand

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Kilometrage

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Continental PremiumContact 7

81%

Soelaas

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Buitengeluid

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Continental PremiumContact 7

69%

Inwendig geluid

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

100%

Continental PremiumContact 7

88%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Vergelijking: GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Efficientgrip SUV

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

PremiumContact 7

Testprofiel

Nat

Droog

Kosten

Soelaas

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking