12 Winkels · 123,162+ Producten
BANDENLAB.BE

Vergelijking: GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUVPremie
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip SUV

R16 – R22
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2Premie
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

7.8
R15 – R20
Hankook ION EvoPremie
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
Falken e.ZiexBovenmidden
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Continental PremiumContact 7Premie
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 7

9.8
R16 – R21
Vergelijk ook met
PILOT ALPIN 5 SportContact 7 Ventus Evo

Testprofiel

GoodYear
Efficientgrip SUV
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Aantal tests
—
18
1
3
26
Beste positie
—
#1
#1
#2
#1
Gemiddelde positie
—
6.1
1.0
3.7
2.2
Laatste test
—
2024
2025
2025
2026
Beschikbare maten
123
47
64
34
66

Nat

Nat
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Remmen op nat wegdek
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%

Droog

Droog
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Droogremmen
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Droge behandeling
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%

Kosten

Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Rolweerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Kilometrage
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%

Soelaas

Soelaas
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Buitengeluid
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking