12 Winkels · 123,162+ Producten
BANDENLAB.BE

Vergelijking: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin Primacy 5 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Falken e.Ziex

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premie
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Michelin Primacy 5Premie
MichelinMichelin

Primacy 5

8.3
R16 – R21
Hankook ION EvoPremie
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
Bridgestone Blizzak 6Premie
BridgestoneBridgestone

Blizzak 6

9.1
R16 – R22
Falken e.ZiexBovenmidden
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Vergelijk ook met
SportContact 7 Ventus Evo PremiumContact 7

Testprofiel

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 5
Hankook
ION Evo
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Falken
e.Ziex
Aantal tests
3
4
1
14
3
Beste positie
#2
#1
#1
#1
#2
Gemiddelde positie
3.3
5.0
1.0
3.6
3.7
Laatste test
2026
2026
2025
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
40
126
64
188
34

Nat

Nat
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin Primacy 5
76%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Remmen op nat wegdek
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
75%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Michelin Primacy 5
73%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Michelin Primacy 5
88%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Natte prestaties
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 5
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%

Droog

Droog
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 5
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Droogremmen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin Primacy 5
80%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
56%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Droge behandeling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin Primacy 5
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Droge prestaties
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Michelin Primacy 5
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Droge stuurrespons
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Soelaas

Soelaas
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Michelin Primacy 5
56%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Buitengeluid
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Michelin Primacy 5
99%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Soelaas
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%

Kosten

Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin Primacy 5
73%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolweerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Michelin Primacy 5
73%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Kilometrage
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
28%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking