Vergelijking: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Pirelli P Zero (PZ5) vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Premie

GoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

VS

Vergelijk ook met

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 4 S

Testprofiel

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Primacy

P Zero (PZ5)

e.Ziex

UltraContact NXT

Aantal tests

3

4

2

3

2

Beste positie

#2

#3

#1

#2

#1

Gemiddelde positie

3.3

12.0

3.0

3.7

1.0

Laatste test

2026

2025

2026

2025

Beschikbare maten

40

111

17

34

23

Nat

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)

80%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

Remmen op nat wegdek

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)

76%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)

64%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)

93%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)

100%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

Natte zijgeleiding

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Michelin e.Primacy

78%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Droog

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)

92%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Droogremmen

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)

88%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Continental UltraContact NXT

63%

Droge behandeling

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)

96%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Droge rijstrook wisselen

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

93%

Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)

92%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Continental UltraContact NXT

100%

Droge stuurrespons

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Michelin e.Primacy

85%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Soelaas

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)

87%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

Buitengeluid

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)

74%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

Soelaas

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)

100%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Kosten

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)

77%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Rolweerstand

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)

77%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Vergelijking: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Pirelli P Zero (PZ5) vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Primacy

P Zero (PZ5)

e.Ziex

UltraContact NXT

Testprofiel

Nat

Droog

Soelaas

Kosten

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking