12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Continental SportContact 7

Testprofiel

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Continental
SportContact 7
Aantal tests
4
4
18
3
16
Beste positie
#2
#3
#1
#4
#1
Gemiddelde positie
3.3
12.0
6.1
4.3
1.2
Laatste test
2026
2025
2024
2025
2026
Beschikbare maten
40
111
47
99
124

Nat

Nat
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Continental SportContact 7
84%
Remmen op nat wegdek
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Continental SportContact 7
95%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Continental SportContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Continental SportContact 7
84%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
Continental SportContact 7
66%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Continental SportContact 7
87%
Natte zijgeleiding
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental SportContact 7
80%

Droog

Droog
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Continental SportContact 7
91%
Droogremmen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Continental SportContact 7
96%
Droge behandeling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Continental SportContact 7
94%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Continental SportContact 7
86%
Droge stuurrespons
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Continental SportContact 7
85%

Soelaas

Soelaas
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Continental SportContact 7
78%
Buitengeluid
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Continental SportContact 7
75%
Soelaas
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
68%
Continental SportContact 7
70%

Kosten

Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Continental SportContact 7
77%
Rolweerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Continental SportContact 7
77%
Kilometrage
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking