12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofiel

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Aantal tests
4
4
6
24
28
Beste positie
#2
#3
#3
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
3.3
12.0
4.7
2.7
2.3
Laatste test
2026
2025
2026
2025
2026
Beschikbare maten
40
111
146
302
67

Nat

Nat
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Remmen op nat wegdek
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Prestaties op nat wegdek
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
95%

Droog

Droog
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Droogremmen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Droge behandeling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Prestaties op droog wegdek
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
92%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Droge stuurrespons
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%

Soelaas

Soelaas
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Buitengeluid
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Soelaas
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
73%
Inwendig geluid
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
97%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%

Kosten

Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Rolweerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Kilometrage
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
64%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking