12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

Testprofiel

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Aantal tests
4
4
14
17
Beste positie
#2
#3
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
3.3
12.0
3.6
1.7
Laatste test
2026
2025
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
40
111
194
80

Nat

Nat
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Remmen op nat wegdek
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
Prestaties op nat wegdek
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Natte zijgeleiding
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
87%

Droog

Droog
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Droogremmen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Droge behandeling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Prestaties op droog wegdek
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Droog rijgedrag
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
67%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
78%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
Droge stuurrespons
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%

Soelaas

Soelaas
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Buitengeluid
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Soelaas
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
Inwendig geluid
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
98%

Kosten

Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Rolweerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Kilometrage
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking