12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Testprofiel

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
CrossClimate 2 SUV
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Aantal tests
4
2
18
10
6
Beste positie
#2
#1
#1
#2
#3
Gemiddelde positie
3.3
1.5
6.1
6.0
4.7
Laatste test
2026
2024
2024
2026
2026
Beschikbare maten
40
54
47
109
146

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nat
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Remmen op nat wegdek
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Droog
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Droogremmen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Droge behandeling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Soelaas
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Buitengeluid
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Soelaas
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Rolweerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Kilometrage
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store