12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Pirelli P Zero Winter 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

Testprofiel

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Pirelli
P Zero Winter 2
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Aantal tests
4
3
2
29
Beste positie
#2
#4
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
3.3
4.3
2.0
3.7
Laatste test
2026
2025
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
40
99
48
180

Nat

Nat
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
80%
Remmen op nat wegdek
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
59%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
13%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Prestaties op nat wegdek
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
77%

Droog

Droog
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
Droogremmen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
76%
Droge behandeling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
Prestaties op droog wegdek
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
59%
Droge stuurrespons
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
87%

Soelaas

Soelaas
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
Buitengeluid
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Soelaas
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
68%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
Inwendig geluid
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%

Kosten

Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
74%
Rolweerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
92%
Kilometrage
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
51%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking