Vergelijking: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Dunlop Winter

Premie

GoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

VS

Vergelijk ook met

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

PremiumContact 7

Testprofiel

Efficientgrip Performance 2

WinterCraft WP52+

UltraGrip Performance+

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Winter

Aantal tests

3

23

5

2

Beste positie

#2

#4

#1

Gemiddelde positie

3.3

4.3

3.3

2.2

1.5

Laatste test

2026

2025

Beschikbare maten

40

97

176

63

65

Nat

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

79%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Remmen op nat wegdek

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Dunlop Winter

84%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Dunlop Winter

71%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Dunlop Winter

67%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

66%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Dunlop Winter

63%

Droog

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Dunlop Winter

69%

Droogremmen

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Droge behandeling

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Dunlop Winter

64%

Soelaas

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Buitengeluid

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Soelaas

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

68%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

79%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Inwendig geluid

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

100%

Kosten

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Dunlop Winter

83%

Rolweerstand

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Dunlop Winter

81%

Kilometrage

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Vergelijking: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Dunlop Winter

Efficientgrip Performance 2

WinterCraft WP52+

UltraGrip Performance+

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Winter

Testprofiel

Nat

Droog

Soelaas

Kosten

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking