12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Testprofiel

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Aantal tests
4
10
18
13
3
1
Beste positie
#2
#2
#1
#1
#2
#1
Gemiddelde positie
3.3
6.0
6.1
4.3
3.7
1.0
Laatste test
2026
2026
2024
2025
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
40
109
47
123
36
66

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nat
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Remmen op nat wegdek
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Droog
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Droogremmen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Droge behandeling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Michelin Primacy 4+
74%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Soelaas
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Buitengeluid
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Soelaas
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolweerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Kilometrage
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store