12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Continental UltraContact vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Testprofiel

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Continental
UltraContact
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Aantal tests
4
10
1
18
6
Beste positie
#2
#2
#7
#1
#3
Gemiddelde positie
3.3
6.0
7.0
6.1
4.7
Laatste test
2026
2026
2023
2024
2026
Beschikbare maten
40
109
88
47
146

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Remmen op nat wegdek
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Continental UltraContact
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Continental UltraContact
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Continental UltraContact
58%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Droog
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Continental UltraContact
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Droogremmen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Continental UltraContact
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Droge behandeling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Soelaas
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Buitengeluid
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Soelaas
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Continental UltraContact
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Rolweerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Kilometrage
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Continental UltraContact
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store