12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Continental UltraContact vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Testprofiel

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Continental
UltraContact
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Aantal tests
4
10
1
18
3
Beste positie
#2
#2
#7
#1
#2
Gemiddelde positie
3.3
6.0
7.0
6.1
3.7
Laatste test
2026
2026
2023
2024
2025
Beschikbare maten
40
109
88
47
36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nat
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Remmen op nat wegdek
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Continental UltraContact
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Continental UltraContact
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Continental UltraContact
58%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Droog
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Continental UltraContact
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Droogremmen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Continental UltraContact
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Droge behandeling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Soelaas
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Buitengeluid
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Soelaas
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Continental UltraContact
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolweerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Kilometrage
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Continental UltraContact
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store