12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Testprofiel

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Aantal tests
4
1
29
14
Beste positie
#2
#1
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
3.3
1.0
3.7
3.6
Laatste test
2026
2025
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
40
66
180
194

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Remmen op nat wegdek
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Prestaties op nat wegdek
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Natte zijgeleiding
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
87%
Droog
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Droogremmen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Droge behandeling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Prestaties op droog wegdek
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
59%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Droge stuurrespons
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Soelaas
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Buitengeluid
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Soelaas
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Inwendig geluid
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Rolweerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
92%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Kilometrage
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
51%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store