12 Winkels · 123,162+ Producten
BANDENLAB.BE

Vergelijking: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premie
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Hankook ION EvoPremie
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
Bridgestone Blizzak 6Premie
BridgestoneBridgestone

Blizzak 6

9.1
R16 – R22
Continental UltraContact NXTPremie
ContinentalContinental

UltraContact NXT

9.5
R16 – R20
Vergelijk ook met
PremiumContact 7 Cinturato (C3) Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofiel

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Aantal tests
3
1
14
2
Beste positie
#2
#1
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
3.3
1.0
3.6
1.0
Laatste test
2026
2025
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
40
64
188
23

Nat

Nat
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Remmen op nat wegdek
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
Natte prestaties
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%

Droog

Droog
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Droogremmen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
56%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
Droge behandeling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Droge prestaties
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Droge stuurrespons
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%

Soelaas

Soelaas
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Buitengeluid
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
Soelaas
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%

Kosten

Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Rolweerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Kilometrage
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
28%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking