Vergelijking: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Dunlop Winter vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Premie

GoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

VS

Vergelijk ook met

PILOT ALPIN 5

SportContact 7

WinterContact TS 870

Testprofiel

Efficientgrip Performance 2

UltraGrip Performance+

e.Ziex

Winter

UltraContact NXT

Aantal tests

3

23

3

2

Beste positie

#2

#1

#2

#1

Gemiddelde positie

3.3

3.7

1.5

1.0

Laatste test

2026

2025

Beschikbare maten

40

176

34

65

23

Nat

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

Remmen op nat wegdek

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Dunlop Winter

84%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Dunlop Winter

67%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Dunlop Winter

71%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Dunlop Winter

63%

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

Droog

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dunlop Winter

69%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Droogremmen

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Continental UltraContact NXT

63%

Droge behandeling

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Dunlop Winter

64%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Droge rijstrook wisselen

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

74%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Continental UltraContact NXT

100%

Droge stuurrespons

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

79%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Soelaas

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

Buitengeluid

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

Soelaas

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

79%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Inwendig geluid

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Kosten

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Dunlop Winter

83%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Rolweerstand

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Dunlop Winter

81%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Kilometrage

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Vergelijking: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Dunlop Winter vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Efficientgrip Performance 2

UltraGrip Performance+

e.Ziex

Winter

UltraContact NXT

Testprofiel

Nat

Droog

Soelaas

Kosten

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking