12 Winkels · 123,162+ Producten

Vergelijking: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofiel

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Aantal tests
3
23
14
26
Beste positie
#2
#1
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
3.3
3.3
3.6
2.2
Laatste test
2026
2025
2025
2026
Beschikbare maten
40
176
188
66

Nat

Nat
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Remmen op nat wegdek
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Natte prestaties
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
45%

Droog

Droog
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Droogremmen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
56%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Droge behandeling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Droge prestaties
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Continental PremiumContact 7
35%
Droog rijgedrag
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
67%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Droge stuurrespons
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%

Soelaas

Soelaas
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Buitengeluid
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Soelaas
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Inwendig geluid
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%

Kosten

Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Rolweerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Kilometrage
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
28%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking