12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Dunlop Winter vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

Testprofiel

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Dunlop
Winter
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Aantal tests
4
6
2
29
Beste positie
#2
#3
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
3.3
4.7
1.5
3.7
Laatste test
2026
2026
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
40
146
66
180

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
80%
Remmen op nat wegdek
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Dunlop Winter
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Dunlop Winter
67%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Dunlop Winter
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Dunlop Winter
63%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Prestaties op nat wegdek
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
80%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
77%
Droog
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Dunlop Winter
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
Droogremmen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
76%
Droge behandeling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Dunlop Winter
64%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
Prestaties op droog wegdek
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
92%
Dunlop Winter
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
59%
Droge stuurrespons
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
87%
Soelaas
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
Buitengeluid
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Soelaas
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
Inwendig geluid
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Dunlop Winter
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
74%
Rolweerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Dunlop Winter
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
92%
Kilometrage
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
51%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store