12 Winkels · 123,162+ Producten

Vergelijking: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Testprofiel

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Aantal tests
3
3
17
14
Beste positie
#2
#2
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
3.3
3.7
1.7
3.6
Laatste test
2026
2025
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
40
34
80
188

Nat

Nat
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Remmen op nat wegdek
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
92%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Natte prestaties
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Natte zijgeleiding
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
87%

Droog

Droog
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Droogremmen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
56%
Droge behandeling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Droge prestaties
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Droog rijgedrag
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
67%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Droge stuurrespons
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%

Soelaas

Soelaas
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Buitengeluid
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Soelaas
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Inwendig geluid
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
98%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%

Kosten

Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Rolweerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Kilometrage
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
28%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking