12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Testprofiel

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Aantal tests
4
3
14
15
5
Beste positie
#2
#2
#1
#2
#1
Gemiddelde positie
3.3
3.7
3.6
9.0
2.8
Laatste test
2026
2025
2025
2025
2026
Beschikbare maten
40
36
194
226
139

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Remmen op nat wegdek
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Prestaties op nat wegdek
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
82%
Droog
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Droogremmen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Droge behandeling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Prestaties op droog wegdek
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Droog rijgedrag
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
67%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Droge stuurrespons
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Soelaas
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Buitengeluid
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Soelaas
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Inwendig geluid
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
66%
Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Rolweerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Kilometrage
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store