12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Dunlop Winter vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

Testprofiel

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Dunlop
Winter
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Aantal tests
4
2
14
17
Beste positie
#2
#1
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
3.3
1.5
3.6
1.7
Laatste test
2026
2025
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
40
66
194
80

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Remmen op nat wegdek
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Dunlop Winter
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Dunlop Winter
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Dunlop Winter
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Dunlop Winter
63%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
Prestaties op nat wegdek
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Droog
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Dunlop Winter
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Droogremmen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Droge behandeling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Dunlop Winter
64%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Prestaties op droog wegdek
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Dunlop Winter
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Droog rijgedrag
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
67%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
78%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
Droge stuurrespons
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Soelaas
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Buitengeluid
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Soelaas
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
Inwendig geluid
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
98%
Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Dunlop Winter
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Rolweerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Dunlop Winter
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Kilometrage
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store