12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. Michelin Primacy 5 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Testprofiel

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Michelin
Primacy 5
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Aantal tests
4
17
5
14
Beste positie
#2
#1
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
3.3
1.7
4.8
3.6
Laatste test
2026
2025
2026
2025
Beschikbare maten
40
80
158
194

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Remmen op nat wegdek
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Michelin Primacy 5
92%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Prestaties op nat wegdek
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin Primacy 5
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Droog
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Droogremmen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Droge behandeling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Michelin Primacy 5
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Droog rijgedrag
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
67%
Prestaties op droog wegdek
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 5
62%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Droge stuurrespons
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Soelaas
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Michelin Primacy 5
95%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Buitengeluid
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Soelaas
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Inwendig geluid
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
98%
Michelin Primacy 5
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Rolweerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Kilometrage
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store