12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. Dunlop Winter vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Testprofiel

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Dunlop
Winter
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Aantal tests
4
17
2
14
Beste positie
#2
#1
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
3.3
1.7
1.5
3.6
Laatste test
2026
2025
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
40
80
66
194

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Remmen op nat wegdek
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
Dunlop Winter
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Dunlop Winter
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Dunlop Winter
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
Dunlop Winter
63%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Prestaties op nat wegdek
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Droog
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Dunlop Winter
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Droogremmen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Droge behandeling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Dunlop Winter
64%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Prestaties op droog wegdek
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Dunlop Winter
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Droog rijgedrag
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
67%
Droge stuurrespons
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Soelaas
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Buitengeluid
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Soelaas
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Inwendig geluid
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
98%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Dunlop Winter
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Rolweerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Dunlop Winter
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Kilometrage
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store