12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Testprofiel

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Aantal tests
4
28
3
24
Beste positie
#2
#1
#4
#1
Gemiddelde positie
3.3
2.3
4.3
2.7
Laatste test
2026
2026
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
40
67
99
302

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Remmen op nat wegdek
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
90%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
78%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
88%
Prestaties op nat wegdek
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
95%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Droog
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Droogremmen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Droge behandeling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Prestaties op droog wegdek
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
Droge stuurrespons
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Soelaas
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Buitengeluid
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Soelaas
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
73%
Inwendig geluid
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
97%
Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Rolweerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Kilometrage
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
64%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store