12 Winkels · 123,162+ Producten
BANDENLAB.BE

Vergelijking: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Falken e.Ziex

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premie
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005Premie
BridgestoneBridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

8.2
R14 – R22
Continental UltraContact NXTPremie
ContinentalContinental

UltraContact NXT

9.5
R16 – R20
Falken e.ZiexBovenmidden
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Vergelijk ook met
PILOT ALPIN 5 SportContact 7 WinterContact TS 870

Testprofiel

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Falken
e.Ziex
Aantal tests
3
49
2
3
Beste positie
#2
#1
#1
#2
Gemiddelde positie
3.3
3.2
1.0
3.7
Laatste test
2026
2024
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
40
213
23
34

Nat

Nat
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Remmen op nat wegdek
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
93%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Natte zijgeleiding
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
100%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Droog

Droog
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Droogremmen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Droge behandeling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Droog rijgedrag
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
Droge stuurrespons
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Falken e.Ziex
87%

Soelaas

Soelaas
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Buitengeluid
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Soelaas
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Inwendig geluid
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%

Kosten

Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolweerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Kilometrage
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking