Vergelijking: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Premie

GoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

VS

Vergelijk ook met

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Testprofiel

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Blizzak 6

e.Primacy

Ventus Evo

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Aantal tests

3

14

4

3

5

Beste positie

#2

#1

#3

#2

#1

Gemiddelde positie

3.3

3.6

12.0

3.3

2.2

Laatste test

2026

2025

2026

2025

Beschikbare maten

40

188

111

60

63

Nat

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

78%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Remmen op nat wegdek

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Droog

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Droogremmen

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

56%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Droge behandeling

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Droge prestaties

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

64%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

59%

Droge rijstrook wisselen

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

92%

Michelin e.Primacy

93%

Droge stuurrespons

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

74%

Michelin e.Primacy

85%

Soelaas

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Buitengeluid

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

66%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Soelaas

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Kosten

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Rolweerstand

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

85%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Kilometrage

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

28%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Vergelijking: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Blizzak 6

e.Primacy

Ventus Evo

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofiel

Nat

Droog

Soelaas

Kosten

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking