12 Winkels · 123,162+ Producten
BANDENLAB.BE

Vergelijking: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Dunlop Winter

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premie
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Bridgestone Blizzak 6Premie
BridgestoneBridgestone

Blizzak 6

9.1
R16 – R22
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+Bovenmidden
KumhoKumho

WinterCraft WP52+

8.7
R13 – R21
Dunlop WinterPremie
DunlopDunlop

Winter

9.3
R15 – R21
Vergelijk ook met
PILOT ALPIN 5 WinterContact TS 870 PremiumContact 7

Testprofiel

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Dunlop
Winter
Aantal tests
3
14
3
2
Beste positie
#2
#1
#4
#1
Gemiddelde positie
3.3
3.6
4.3
1.5
Laatste test
2026
2025
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
40
188
97
65

Nat

Nat
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Remmen op nat wegdek
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Dunlop Winter
84%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Dunlop Winter
67%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Dunlop Winter
71%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Dunlop Winter
63%
Natte prestaties
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
82%
Dunlop Winter
73%

Droog

Droog
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Dunlop Winter
69%
Droogremmen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
56%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Droge behandeling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Dunlop Winter
64%
Droge prestaties
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Dunlop Winter
78%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%

Soelaas

Soelaas
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Buitengeluid
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Soelaas
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
68%
Dunlop Winter
87%

Kosten

Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Dunlop Winter
83%
Rolweerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Dunlop Winter
81%
Kilometrage
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
28%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Dunlop Winter
87%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking