12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex

Testprofiel

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Falken
e.Ziex
Aantal tests
4
14
10
4
5
3
Beste positie
#2
#1
#2
#3
#1
#2
Gemiddelde positie
3.3
3.6
6.0
12.0
2.2
3.7
Laatste test
2026
2025
2026
2025
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
40
194
109
111
63
36

Nat

Nat
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Remmen op nat wegdek
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Natte zijgeleiding
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Droog

Droog
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Droogremmen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Droge behandeling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Prestaties op droog wegdek
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
78%
Droge stuurrespons
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Falken e.Ziex
87%

Soelaas

Soelaas
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Buitengeluid
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Soelaas
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Kosten

Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolweerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Kilometrage
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking