12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Dunlop Winter vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

Testprofiel

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Dunlop
Winter
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Aantal tests
4
14
2
17
Beste positie
#2
#1
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
3.3
3.6
1.5
1.7
Laatste test
2026
2025
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
40
194
66
80

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Remmen op nat wegdek
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Dunlop Winter
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Dunlop Winter
67%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Dunlop Winter
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Dunlop Winter
63%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
Prestaties op nat wegdek
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Droog
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Dunlop Winter
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Droogremmen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Droge behandeling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Dunlop Winter
64%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Prestaties op droog wegdek
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Dunlop Winter
78%
Droog rijgedrag
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
67%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
78%
Droge stuurrespons
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
Soelaas
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Buitengeluid
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Soelaas
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
Inwendig geluid
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
98%
Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Dunlop Winter
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Rolweerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Dunlop Winter
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Kilometrage
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store