12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Testprofiel

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Aantal tests
4
14
15
3
5
Beste positie
#2
#8
#2
#2
#1
Gemiddelde positie
3.3
13.4
9.0
3.7
2.8
Laatste test
2026
2026
2025
2025
2026
Beschikbare maten
40
153
226
36
139

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nat
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Remmen op nat wegdek
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Prestaties op nat wegdek
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
82%
Droog
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Droogremmen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Droge behandeling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Droog rijgedrag
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Prestaties op droog wegdek
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
83%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Soelaas
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Buitengeluid
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Soelaas
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Rolweerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Kilometrage
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store