Vergelijking: Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Premie

Goodyear

Efficientgrip Cargo

R14 – R17

VS

Premie

Michelin

Vergelijk ook met

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Cinturato (C3)

Testprofiel

Efficientgrip Cargo

e.Primacy

Efficient Grip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

UltraContact NXT

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Aantal tests

1

4

18

3

2

5

Beste positie

#2

#3

#1

#2

#1

Gemiddelde positie

2.0

12.0

6.1

3.7

3.3

1.0

2.2

Laatste test

2019

2025

2024

2025

2026

2025

Beschikbare maten

43

111

47

34

40

23

63

Nat

Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo

73%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

72%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo

67%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo

67%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo

78%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo

67%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

69%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Soelaas

Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo

74%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Buitengeluid

Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo

70%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Droog

Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo

91%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Kosten

Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo

95%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

91%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Kilometrage

Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo

100%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Vergelijking: Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Efficientgrip Cargo

e.Primacy

Efficient Grip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

UltraContact NXT

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofiel

Nat

Soelaas

Droog

Kosten

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking