Vergelijking: Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Premie

Goodyear

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

VS

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 5

Test profile

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Roadhawk

Efficientgrip SUV

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

Aantal tests

5

21

—

3

1

Best position

#1

#2

—

#2

#1

Average position

2.2

11.9

—

3.3

1.0

Laatste test

2025

2024

—

2026

2025

Beschikbare maten

63

164

123

40

64

Nat

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Firestone Roadhawk

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Offroad

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Soelaas

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Buitengeluid

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Firestone Roadhawk

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Soelaas

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

Inwendig geluid

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

100%

Firestone Roadhawk

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Kosten

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Firestone Roadhawk

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Rolweerstand

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Kilometrage

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Firestone Roadhawk

64%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Prijs/waarde

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

87%

Firestone Roadhawk

61%

Hankook ION Evo

60%

Droog

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Firestone Roadhawk

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Droogremmen

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Firestone Roadhawk

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Droge behandeling

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Firestone Roadhawk

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

93%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Vergelijking: Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Roadhawk

Efficientgrip SUV

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

Test profile

Nat

Offroad

Soelaas

Kosten

Droog

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking