Vergelijking: Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental SportContact 7

Premie

Goodyear

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

VS

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 4 S

UltraContact NXT

Test profile

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Efficientgrip Performance 2

SportContact 7

Aantal tests

5

3

1

3

15

Best position

#1

#2

#1

#2

#1

Average position

2.2

3.7

1.0

3.3

1.2

Laatste test

2025

2026

Beschikbare maten

63

34

64

40

122

Nat

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental SportContact 7

84%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Continental SportContact 7

85%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Continental SportContact 7

95%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Continental SportContact 7

89%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Continental SportContact 7

66%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Continental SportContact 7

86%

Offroad

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Soelaas

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Continental SportContact 7

78%

Buitengeluid

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Continental SportContact 7

75%

Soelaas

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Continental SportContact 7

80%

Kosten

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Continental SportContact 7

79%

Rolweerstand

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Continental SportContact 7

79%

Kilometrage

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Droog

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Continental SportContact 7

91%

Droogremmen

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental SportContact 7

97%

Droge behandeling

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental SportContact 7

94%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Vergelijking: Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental SportContact 7

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Efficientgrip Performance 2

SportContact 7

Test profile

Nat

Offroad

Soelaas

Kosten

Droog

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking