Vergelijking: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Michelin Primacy 3 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Premie

Goodyear

Efficient Grip Performance

VS

Vergelijk ook met

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Testprofiel

Efficient Grip Performance

Primacy 3

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

Aantal tests

16

10

3

1

Beste positie

#3

#1

#2

#1

Gemiddelde positie

5.5

6.1

3.7

3.3

1.0

Laatste test

2023

2018

2025

2026

2025

Beschikbare maten

153

182

34

40

64

Nat

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

81%

Michelin Primacy 3

70%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

86%

Michelin Primacy 3

78%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

87%

Michelin Primacy 3

85%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

89%

Michelin Primacy 3

65%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

81%

Michelin Primacy 3

40%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

76%

Michelin Primacy 3

87%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Droog

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

83%

Michelin Primacy 3

83%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Droge behandeling

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

93%

Michelin Primacy 3

80%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Droogremmen

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

83%

Michelin Primacy 3

85%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Droog rijgedrag

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

83%

Michelin Primacy 3

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

65%

Soelaas

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

77%

Michelin Primacy 3

85%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Buitengeluid

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

75%

Michelin Primacy 3

85%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Inwendig geluid

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Soelaas

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

91%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Kosten

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

73%

Michelin Primacy 3

85%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Rolweerstand

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

86%

Michelin Primacy 3

85%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Kilometrage

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

64%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Vergelijking: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Michelin Primacy 3 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Efficient Grip Performance

Primacy 3

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

Testprofiel

Nat

Droog

Soelaas

Kosten

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking