Vergelijking: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Michelin Primacy 5 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Premie

Goodyear

Efficient Grip Performance

VS

Vergelijk ook met

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Testprofiel

Efficient Grip Performance

e.Primacy

Primacy 5

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Aantal tests

16

4

3

1

Beste positie

#3

#1

#2

#1

Gemiddelde positie

5.5

12.0

4.7

3.3

3.7

1.0

Laatste test

2023

2025

2026

2025

Beschikbare maten

153

111

126

40

34

64

Nat

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

81%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Michelin Primacy 5

58%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

87%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

89%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

86%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Michelin Primacy 5

51%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

76%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Michelin Primacy 5

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

81%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Droog

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Michelin Primacy 5

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Droge behandeling

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

93%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Michelin Primacy 5

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Droogremmen

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Michelin Primacy 5

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Soelaas

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Michelin Primacy 5

1%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Buitengeluid

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Soelaas

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

91%

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Kosten

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

73%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Michelin Primacy 5

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Rolweerstand

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

86%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

Michelin Primacy 5

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Kilometrage

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

64%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Vergelijking: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Michelin Primacy 5 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Efficient Grip Performance

e.Primacy

Primacy 5

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Testprofiel

Nat

Droog

Soelaas

Kosten

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking