12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofiel

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
ION FlexClimate
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Aantal tests
16
10
18
1
3
4
Beste positie
#3
#2
#1
#1
#2
#2
Gemiddelde positie
5.5
6.0
6.1
1.0
3.7
3.3
Laatste test
2023
2026
2024
2025
2025
2026
Beschikbare maten
153
109
47
27
36
40

Nat

Nat
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%

Droog

Droog
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Droge behandeling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Droogremmen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Buitengeluid
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Inwendig geluid
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Soelaas
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%

Kosten

Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rolweerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kilometrage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking